Human Agency is a platform that educates people about how advertising works and how to be more informed. We want to reveal how social media platforms derive so much power from the data they collect about you. The agency refers to the thoughts and actions taken by people who express their individual power. The main challenge in the center of the field of sociology is to understand the relationship between structure and agency.
Structure refers to the complex and interconnected set of social forces, relationships, institutions and elements of the social structure that work together to shape people's thinking, behavior, experiences, choices, and general course of life. On the contrary, agency is the power that people have to think for themselves and act in ways that shape their experiences and life trajectories. The agency can take individual and collective forms. In the social sciences, agency is the ability of people to have the power and resources to realize their potential.
For example, structure consists of those influencing factors (such as social class, religion, gender, ethnicity, ability, customs, etc.) The influences of structure and agency are debated; it is not clear to what extent a person's actions are limited by social systems. In this it subtly differs from the concept of free will, the philosophical doctrine that our choices are not the product of causal chains, but are significantly free or indeterminate. Human agency implies the inferior and uncontroversial assertion that humans. In fact, make decisions and implement them in the world.
How human beings make decisions, by free choice or other processes, is not at stake. Many people, including social scientists, often fall into the trap of describing those populations as having no agency. The individual agency is when a person acts on their own behalf, while the representative agency is when a person acts on behalf of another person (such as an employer). The task of this essay is to substantiate this point of convergence, to place the theories of the agency within some of its relations with the media and media theory.
This topic of recognition, or self-understanding, is a trope found in both media and agency discussions. Individual and collective agency can serve to reaffirm the social order by replicating existing social norms and relationships, or it can serve to challenge and remake the social order by going against the status quo to create new norms and relationships. Yet, despite a social structure that produces such worrisome phenomena, sociologists have found that Black and Latino children, and other marginalized and oppressed groups, influence this social context in various ways. One of the world's leading social scientists studying human-technology interactions said: “My main fear is that facial recognition will be used for social control.
While these latter cases may seem like individual failures, in the context of oppressive social environments, resisting and rejecting authority figures who administer oppressive institutions has been documented as an important form of self-preservation and, therefore, as an agency. Therefore, while people's lives are determined by the existing social structure, they nevertheless have the ability — the agency — to make decisions and express them in their behavior. It focuses on three contexts in which the agency and digital services interact to provide information on the framework and characteristics of the agency in these environments. To consider the relationship between structure and agency as dialectic is to affirm that, while social structure shapes individuals, individuals (and groups) also shape the social structure.
But in all of the above cases, the agency is something that, paradoxically, seems to be granted from the outside, by the media or by technology or by public intellectuals. Simultaneously, the agency in this context can also take the form of staying in school and working to excel, despite the social structural forces working to prevent such success. .